![]() |
|
INTRODUCTION
The need for
the removal of odour form sewage plants is becoming more topical worldwide.
Sewage plants were built just outside the existing developed areas so
that they were close to the source, but outside the main populated areas.
As towns and cities have grown, the new developments are now close
to the old sewage plants. Odours generated do cause major concern to
the people living in the area, and odour removal plants are required
to satisfy the public.
In other areas, the odours generated are so bad that development is
not possible. Odour removal allows certain areas to be developed, often
bringing in far more income to the authorities than the cost of purchasing
and operating an odour removal plant.
TECHNOLOGY BASIS AND EXPERIENCE
As the main
water companies in the UK privatized, the pressure mounted quite quickly
on them to remove the odours generated by the various plants.
The UK consultant to FAMSYSTEMS has been involved in building numerous
plants with great success. The list of references has been extended
over the last few years, to represent one of the most complete spectrum
of plants possible. Based on experiences gained, various technologies
can be offered:
- Chemical systems with or without catalyst regeneration Each process has its own advantages. It is difficult to specify clearly
which technology is better for specific duties. The best policy is to
look at the duties of the plant and where possible evaluate the operating
efficiency and compare this to the overall cost of the system, including
capital and operating costs.
It should be noted that the odours generated in a sewage
plant are based on hydrogen sulphide and mercaptans. These chemicals
have very low Odour Threshold levels. Typical value for H2S
is 0.5 parts per billion.
This fact makes the design of odour removal plants of utmost importance.
If the design is not done correctly the required efficiency is not obtained,
the smell will not be removed resulting in continued complaints from
the public.
It is for this reason that the experiences gained over the years are
invaluable to ensure that the odour removal plant removes all traces
of smells.
PROCESS TECHNOLOGIES As indicated above, various technologies exist, and we describe each system to introduce the process and give some guidelines as to the possible applications. 1. CHEMICAL SCRUBBERS Vertical Scrubbers These are standard packed towers where the gases flow vertically upwards and are contacted with a scrubbing liquor. The scrubbing liquid is sprayed onto a packed section so that it is well distributed to give maximum contact area. |
|
|
|
The efficiency of the scrubbers can be designed to any value and it is suitable for very high inlet concentrations of odours. Efficiencies in excess of 99.99% can be obtained. Cross flow wet scrubber
The cross flow
scrubber design is a horizontal scrubber, which can be pre-manufactured
in the workshop to offer a compact and inexpensive scrubber solution for
odour removal. The unit allows the designer to select both height and
width to suit the space available.
The unit comprises of a bed of random tower packing irrigated by the
scrubbing liquid from the front and the top of the bed to ensure complete
and even wetting of the packing.
The scrubbing liquid is circulated from an internal sump and controls
are similar to the vertical units.
The contaminated air flows horizontally through the bed, where absorption
takes place. After the packed bed a special mist eliminator ensures
that no droplets are carried with the gas past the scrubber.
As usual mass transfer calculations are done to ensure an optimum economic
design. As for the vertical scrubbers, the plant is offered complete
with controls, dosing systems etc.
The cross flow scrubber is suitable for odour removal and general chemical
absorption with removal efficiencies in the range 95 to 99.99%.
2. BIOFILTERS Biofilters are designed to adsorb odours from sewage plants and industrial installations. The units comprise of a shallow bed of specifically selected organic fibres or woodchips though which the odours are passed. The gas flows though the packing vertically upwards.. |
![]() |
|
The units operate
by absorbing the odorous compounds onto the surface of the fibres. These
are then broken down biologically into mainly water and carbon dioxide
by micro-organisms attached to the fibres.
The fibres are selected to allow free passage of the air and also to
minimise the frequency of replacement over time. Automatic water sprays
maintain the required moisture level in the bed and also remove the
degraded products.
Biofilters do not require any chemicals, which reduces their overall
operating costs. They are however much larger than chemical scrubbers
and space requirements are often a consideration.
They are suitable for levels of contamination up to 30ppm
of hydrogen sulphide. It is also important that the H2S levels
are fairly constant or at least vary slowly over time. Removal efficiencies
are lower than chemical units and are limited to 90 – 98%.
The biofilter offers many advantages, but due to its operating principle
there are limitations in its use.
3. BIO-SCRUBBERS
Bioscrubbers
are similar in design to the vertical scrubbers described above. Again
the unit is packed with random packing.
The air passes vertically upwards and the scrubbing liquor, which is
the treatment works final effluent, is recirculated to fall downwards
over the packing contacting the gas. The liquid is seeded with a bacteriological
culture. The resulting microbe population on the packing feeds on the
odours and is sustained by a constant feed of final effluent. The resulting
bleed from the unit is passed back to the inlet works.
|
|
|
|
4. ACTIVATED CARBON
This was the
original process used for the removal of odours. Whereas it is no longer
used on large units due to the problem of replacement cost as well as
danger of fire, activated carbon has still applications and we have used
it for a number of special applications.
The carbon absorbers consist of a fixed bed of random pellets
through which the contaminated air flows. The high surface area of the
carbon allows very efficient removal of the contaminants. Typical figures
of 1250m2 per gram are typical.
The carbon is specially selected with coal or coconut shell based carbon
being preferred. For certain applications chemically impregnated carbons
are used to enhance he efficiency and stability of the system. Carbon
can be regenerated, but this is only economical for larger units.
|
![]() |
|||
|
In general one
must assume that the carbon has a limited life and requires replacement
after a certain time period. This makes the carbon absorbers more expensive
to maintain that the biosystem described above.
The main advantage of activated carbon is that within the time limitation
of the material, removal efficiency of 100% can be obtained.
PLANT CHOICE
It is difficult
to confirm the best choice of odour removal system in general terms. The
following aspects will be looked at by us to formulate alternatives:
It is also important for the client to specify the required outlet
levels. With the low Odour Threshold level one can specify as follows:
Obviously the choice of cleaning efficiency required will determine
the overall cost and choice of the plant.
SERVICES OFFERED To offer this type of technology to the South African industry Famsystems has put together a system so that full turnkey contracts can be offered at reasonable costs.
FAMSYSTEMS does not offer the actual measurement of the inlet or outlet concentration of odours as it is felt that this should be done by an independent third party. Names of accredited companies can however be supplied |
|||
Copyright © Famsystems (Pty) Ltd. 2002